Ex-Premierministerin Yingluck Shinawatra droht nun ein Politikverbot für mind. fünf Jahre. Sie musste sich heute vor dem Parlament verantworten, das vom Militär nach dem Putsch eingesetzt worden war. Der 47-Jährigen wird Misswirtschaft in einem Subventionsprogramm für Reisbauern vorgeworfen bei dem ein Schaden in Milliardenhöhe entstanden sein soll.
Ein Gericht in Bangkok hatte sie kurz vor der Machtübernahme des Militärs im Mai des Amtes enthoben und ein Amtsenthebungsverfahren empfohlen. Das vom Militär eingesetzte Parlament griff dies jetzt auf.
«Ich habe keine Amt mehr, dessen ich enthoben werden könnte», sagte Yingluck. Sollte das Parlament sie aber der Misswirtschaft für schuldig befinden, droht ihr ein Politikverbot von bis zu fünf Jahren.
Yingluck verteidigte das Programm. «Wir wollten nur den Bauern helfen», sagte sie. Nach Angaben der Korruptionsbehörde verlor der Staat durch die Subventionen 3,4 Milliarden Euro.
Es geht in diesem Fall um einen Doofling der meint mit der Junta spielen zu können, aber das checkt LIEBSTER Egon nicht… – zudem habe ich gesagt, für welche Fälle LM seinen Zweck erfüllt (wird von beiden Seiten angewendet!)
und hier noch ein Beispiel extra für unseren liebsten Egon:
Hätte man dem Terroristen Ko Tee einen normalen Prozess anhängen wollen, bräuchte es eine Polizei, die auch gegen ROT Terroristen ermittelt – und das ist nicht der Fall -> somit kann man so Pack nur mit LM zu Fall bringen..
Das Problem ist, sie hauen ab ins Ausland und machen Thailand die lange Nase – perfekt wäre es immer noch etwas zur Hand zu haben, das nach internationalem Recht die Auslieferung ermöglicht… kommt schon noch… cha cha… jetzt wird mal YL aus dem Politverkehr gezogen und der Rest gibt sich in 1-2 Jahren hoffentlich von selbst… da braucht es dann auch nicht mehr so viele LM Fälle….
ich denke nicht, das eine Auslieferung aus dem Ausland möglich sein wird, das es dieses Delikt dort nicht in dieser Form gibt. Aber es wird diesen Leuten, die nun im Ausland leben irgendwann sicher leid tun, wenn sie ihre Eltern, Geschwister usw. nicht mehr sehen usw.
Keine Ahnung warum eine winzige Minderheit, sich gegen die Monarchie stellt, wenn um die 80% der Thais dafür sind. Ich halte daher Hetz-Gruppen wie die Nitirat nicht für positiv. Die hetzen solch junge Studenten mit Unwahrheiten gegen die Monarchie auf, nur weil ein Möchtegern-Präsident wie Thaksin die Monarchie stürzen möchte.
Halt ich nich viel von solchen Leuten – der König ist beliebt und tut keinem was. Die traditionelle Elite würde es auch in einer Republik Thailand geben, hat mit der Monarchie nicht viel zu tun.
Die LM Gesetze sind in der Tat absolut kontraproduktiv.
Sie schützen diesen grossen König leider nicht vor
Verunglimpfung sondern werden im Gegenteil
von Thaksins Hasspredigern und ihren Mittätern
dazu benutzt sich unter Vorspiegelung falscher
Tatsachen im westlichen Ausland Asyl zu erschleichen!
Die westlichen Staaten erkennen zu Recht die hiesigen
LM Gesetze nicht an.
Aber die Figuren die sich im Westen Asyl unter der
Vorspiegelung der LM Verfolgung erschleichen,
haben hier ganz andere Straftaten begangen:
Mord,Totschlag,Körperverletzung,
Brandstiftung,Landfriedensbruch
Betrug,Erpressung,Meineid
oder die Anstiftung oder zumindest
Unterstützung dazu.
Vieles davon ist in jedem westlichen Land
strafbar und würde zur Verhaftung
und Verurteilung führen.
Nur eben Thai LM nicht!
Deshalb berufen sich Thaksins
Hassprediger und Mitläufer darauf.
Dazu kommt dass Polizei und Staatsanwaltschaft
immer noch von Thaksins Lakaien durchsetzt sind,
die jeden klaren international anerkennenswerten
Haftbefehl gegen ihre „Brüder“ vereiteln!
wie üblich von Egon: absolut verdrehter Thaksin Jodler Mist…
womit ich nicht sagen will, dass ich LM als tolles Gesetz einstufe, aber gegen gewisse Leute ist es wohl, das einzige, womit man die Typen (so lange sie noch in Thailand sind) zum schweigen bringt, damit nicht das ganze Theater mit der Super Thaksin Demokratie wieder von vorne losgeht!
ben
ja die nz ist natuerlich ein totales verdreher und luegenblatt.
die behauptung , dass die lm faelle unter deinem fuhrer gewaltig zugenommen haben , ist natuerlich auch eine erfindung des thaksin jodlers egon.
wie verblendet bist du eigentlich?
du meinst vermutlich LM – ja, Prayuth ist bekannt dafür, das er LM gnadenlos verfolgt. Einfach halt keine Kritik an der Monarchie üben, dann passt es ja.
Diese beiden jungen Studenten wissen sowie eigentlich nichts darüber – was Sache ist. Die folgen den Mainstreams aus dem Ausland, glauben der König hatte 30 Milliarden gehortet und kritisieren halt einfach drauf los. Kommt mir vor, wie die Holocaust-Leugner, die wissen es ja auch angeblich besser und werden halt auch dafür bestraft,das sie öffentlich ihre Meinung sagen. Same procedere….
Es gibt keine absolute Meinungsfreiheit – weltweit nicht und gerade jene, wie die Charlie Hebdo – die mit Karrikaturen die Meinungsfreiheit stärken wollen, wollen auf der anderen Seite, das Pegida verboten wird – also was nun?
Das von ihnen angerichtete Blutbad in Ramkhamhaeng war der Grund
weshalb sich Thaksins
Rote Teilzeitterroristen nicht mehr zu einer Demo in die Innenstadt getraut haben.
Dort wären sie nämlich gelyncht worden!
Deshalb dann diese traurige Abschiedsvorstellung in Chalerms Jagdrevier
am Puthamonton!
berndgrimm(Quote) (Reply)
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11384953
Dummes Zeug der Thaksinjodler.
Geschichtsverfälschung wie bei
den Nazis nach dem Ende des Tausendjährigen Reiches.
Thaksin war nie an wirklicher Demokratie interessiert weil
die schlecht für sein „Geschäft“ ist.
Er wollte nur die Mehrheit,möglichst Zweidrittel, damit er seine
Betrügereien selbst absegnen konnte.
Zur Demokratie gehört auch die Opposition.
Die hat er immer als „Loser“ verachtet und war deshalb
auch nicht bereit und in der Lage während der Abhisit
Regierung seine Lakaien Oppositionsarbeit machen zu lassen.
Stattdessen inszenierte er seine Volksrevolutionsoper 2009/10
mit anschliesendem Bauernkrieg, Blutbad und Abfackeln.
Nach dem grossen „Wahl“sieg 2011 und fast 3 Jahren Yingluck Regierung
währendessen er sich seine Zweidrittelmehrheit zusammenkaufte
wurde er genauso übermütig wie nach seinem eigenen „Wahl“sieg 2005!
Damals sah er sich selbst als Präsident und wurde zu Recht abgesetzt.
Diesmal wollte er sich selbst und seinen Hasspredigern und Teilzeitterroristen
den Persilschein ausstellen.
Die grössten und längsten freiwilligen und unbezahlten Demonstrationen die Thailand
je erlebt hat haben sein Marionettentheater unter der Führung
seines Nummerngirls so aus dem Konzept gebracht,
insbesondere als auch das Abschlachten von 30 Demonstanten und
unbeteiligten Zuschauern durch die allgefälligen Roten Teilzeitterroristen
die Demos nicht beendete sondern noch grösser machte.
So ging die seit November 2013 schon andauernd flüchtende Yingluck
Regierung jämmerlich zu Grunde!
Der juristische Nachfolger Yinglucks weigerte sich seinen Job als
PM anzutreten.Er war eigentlich nur zum Mitkassieren dabei!
Soweit zur Putsch Lüge der Thaksinisten!
Danach gab es die Kritsuda Folterlüge und seitdem ab und zu
eine neue Lüge in Thaksins Wahrheitsblättchen Matichon und Khaosod
sowie seinem Humanmistischen Kampfblatt Prachatai.
Seriöse Kritik an der Militärdiktatur die von den angeblich Gelben
Blättern intelligent verpackt laufend verbreitet wurde
fand dort wegen Selbstzensur nicht statt.
Die haben bis heute noch nicht einmal über den grössten Korruptionsskandal
bei der „Polizei“ berichtet! Warum eigentlich nicht?
Nein, Thaksin und seine Hassprediger hoffen darauf dass Prayuth
einen Fehler macht, der Thaksins Comeback ermöglichen würde.
Ich hoffe dass er solch einen grossen Fehler nicht macht.
berndgrimm(Quote) (Reply)
berndgrimm(Quote) (Reply)
Die Historie gesehen von einem echten Rot Käppchen..
Sehe ich irgendwo wo was vom Gemetzel auf dem Unigelände??? und Suthep wolle selbst PM warden???? 555555
Students left under siege as day turned to nightmare /
When shots rang out and five were killed around Ramkhamhaeng University last weekend, police were nowhere to be seen during 17 hours of terror
Published: 8 Dec 2013 at 00.00
Phoo, a 31-year-old political science student studying at Ramkhamhaeng University usually keeps her distance from both sides of Thai politics. But last Saturday, her friends urged her to join the anti-government rally outside the campus. \’\’Come on, don\’t be chicken,\’\‘ a friend said to Phoo. \’\’It\’s not like someone is going to kill us there.\’\‘ Phoo, who lives across the road from the campus, thought she would go for a few hours and be back in her room by 8pm or 9pm, as she is most nights when studying. But Phoo would become one of thousands of students trapped on campus for 17 terrifying hours as street battles raged around them and shots were fired from a freeway flyover, and, some students and teachers claim, from snipers hiding in university buildings. Officials have so far confirmed that five people died during and after the siege of Saturday night and Sunday morning. Interviews by Spectrum have confirmed violent battles between the students and armed red shirt supporters who were gathering for a mass rally of 70,000 people to show support for the embattled government of Yingluck Shinawatra at Rajamangala National Stadium, which is next to the university campus. While reporters and television news crews openly witnessed and recorded the street skirmishes between the students and red shirts on Saturday afternoon as government supporters travelled to the stadium, little has been revealed about what happened later that night. Spectrum has learned that there were bloody confrontations in Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24 behind the university and stadium as red shirts, at least half a dozen believed to be armed, and students carrying bats and rocks attacked each other. Our team was also told of how men in police uniforms stood idly by as the fighting took place. A 29-year-old Cambodian worker living in a small tin worker\’s shed under the stairs of a stadium under construction at the university, was unlucky enough to be struck by a stray bullet, but Spectrum was told by other workers at the site that bullets had penetrated their tin sheds and they showed us the bullet holes as proof. As the violence raged and the majority of students sought haven inside the university, it still remains a mystery as to why the police refused to answer a request for help from the university\’s rector, Assoc Prof Wuthisak Larpcharoensap, or why the organisers of the red shirt rally were allowed to stage the event at the stadium when it was public knowledge that many Ramkhamhaeng students and academics are antagonistic towards the government. For Ramkhamhaeng students such as Phoo, who was listening to anti-government speeches from a stage set up inside the university square, things were proceeding with decorum until about 7pm. \’\’I started to hear the guns and the bombs,\’\‘ she said. \’\’The students started to scream. I was terrified and thought about running back home. \’\’But there were many young students there and they were even more panicked than me. I felt sorry for them so I stuck around to help.\’\‘ Students injured off-campus were taken to the area near the stage and Phoo and others cleaned their wounds as the night wore on and more casualties arrived. \’\’I used Facebook, Twitter and all kinds of social media to ask for more medical supplies from people outside as I heard that no ambulances could get near the area. First aid supplies ran out quickly, but luckily a rescue team gave us some more when they came in to take the injured students to nearby hospitals.\’\‘ For 17 hours the students endured the ordeal. It only ended when soldiers arrived around noon on Sunday and allowed them to leave the campus, many of them wearing flak jackets provided by the military. \’\’I heard that soldiers were coming to help us, I felt so relieved,\’\‘ Phoo said. \’\’I knew that everyone would be safe. So I decided to get out from the university around 11am and managed to get back to my condo safely.\’\‘
Spoiling for a Fight
Apemuk Sinchai, 35, who is studying education at Ramkhamhaeng, said tensions between students and red shirts at the stadium had been brewing since the previous Wednesday. Mr Apemuk, who once headed the San Saeng Thong student party at the university, said a group of younger students were attacked and abused after returning from an anti-government rally at Democracy Monument and street vendors and food sellers had also earned the ire of the red shirts.
\’\’Anyone with a whistle around their necks can become a red shirt target,\’\‘ said Mr Apemuk, referring to the anti-government protest action of \’\’blowing the whistle\’\‘ at the Yingluck government which opponents claim is a puppet of ousted former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra. The campus rumour mill went into overdrive when three students returning from the rally at Democracy Monument were hauled into Wang Thonglang police station and tested for drugs and searched for weapons. Even though police found nothing, they were detained at the station overnight and until the afternoon of the following day. Further suspicions were to be raised on Thursday, when a banner of images of the symbol of the university, King Ramkhamhaeng, was vandalised. \’\’I got a phone call from students at the university at around 7pm last Thursday,\’\‘ Mr Apemuk said. \’\’They said they were attacked by red shirts and the red shirts cut the image of King Ramkhamhaeng from the banner. For us that was very offensive,\’\‘ he said. By Friday, the situation had reached boiling point when there were reports that a female student had been slapped by a red shirt guard near the university.
Bring it on
Assistant National Police chief Pol Gen Jaramporn Suramanee said the student leaders started to gather in front of the university two days before the violent clashes. They were mobilising the students, accusing the red shirts of attacking Ramkhamhaeng students. Confrontations between the two groups occurred sporadically but there was no violence, Pol Gen Jaramporn said. Late on Saturday morning, police say a group of the students smashed a Toyota Fortuner in Ramkhamhaeng Soi 65 as they believed it belonged to red shirts. In the late afternoon, a few hundred students had gathered in front of the main gates near the clock tower by Ramkhamhaeng Road. Some stood under trees to avoid the scorching sun, while others stood in the open, waving Thai flags. On the road, 10 current and former student leaders had turned a truck into a mobile stage from which they delivered anti-government speeches to the crowd, which sporadically booed and jeered. The student leaders slammed red shirt protesters who were gathering in Rajamangala Stadium, one bus stop away, and accused them of disturbing classes at the university. Mr Apemuk, one of the speakers, said after the alleged attacks on students they had sought assurances from local police commanders that they would be safe. At about 4pm, the student leaders invited their rector, Mr Wuthisak, as well as the police commanders of Hua Mak and Wang Thonglang police stations, to a meeting where they read a statement calling on the officers to ensure their safety from the red shirt protesters. They also asked the governor of the Sports Authority of Thailand to review his decision to allow the stadium to host the red shirt rally. But after the letter was handed to the rector and the two police commanders, the other side of the road was plunged into chaos. The students standing in the shade and others on the roadside ran across Ramkhamhaeng Road, crossed over the steel barrier dividing the road and began shouted abuse. Pickup trucks carrying red shirt protesters were the target. By 5pm, the truck used as a makeshift stage had left and the situation descended into violence. Spectrum witnessed students armed with wooden sticks and clubs, rocks, chunks of cement and iron bars attacking the red shirt vehicles. Student leaders tried to persuade the students to retreat to the university compound. The main gates were open, but several students, mostly young men in jeans and black T-shirts were still patrolling on the street. They intercepted motorcycles, cars and others they believed were headed to the stadium. One elderly couple on a motorcycle was asked to make a U-turn when the students noticed they were wearing red T-shirts under their shirts. At about 6pm, a group of students attacked a public bus they believed had red shirts on board, shattering windows and terrifying passengers with rocks and chunks of concrete. A few gunshots were heard as the bus drove away. The situation was out of hand as bystanders sought sanctuary inside shops. The students set up a roadblock to check on red shirts at Thep Leela intersection and another near the stadium. A 500m section of Ramkhamhaeng Road was empty of traffic, falling silent as the street lights flickered on. No police were present despite the unstable situation. By 7pm, a few thousand students were scattered around Phor Khun Ramkhamhaeng square inside the university. Young male students armed with sticks and clubs, and under control of the student leaders who had resumed their speeches inside the campus, were appointed security guards. But at the back entrance of the university, in Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24, more than 100 students had gathered.
You’re on your own
The students and teachers sheltering inside the campus had little idea of what was going on outside the gates. All they were aware of from about 7pm was shots being fired into the compound and the sounds of explosions, most likely ping-pong bombs. To add to the dramatic situation, a helicopter shining a spotlight passed overhead, fuelling some students\‘ fears that they were being shot at from the air. \’\’From time to time, we saw the helicopter fly over the university with a big spotlight shining on us,\’\‘ said Phoo. \’\’After it had gone, there were the sounds of gunshots and bombs going off.\’\‘
Despite the precarious situation inside the university, police refused to come to the rescue. Two patrol cars were stationed on a freeway flyover where students and teachers thought shots were being fired from. \’\’The situation was very severe,\’\‘ Pol Col Narongrit Promsawat, the superintendent of Hua Mak police station, said. \’\’We couldn\’t get inside as it was dangerous; four police officers were hurt, a police car was hit and we could not specify which side did that.\’\‘ Mr Wuthisak said he did not want the student leaders to rally inside the campus, but opened the gates after the earlier scuffles on Ramkhamhaeng Road. He said after the letter from the student leaders asking for the police to protect them was handed over to the two officers, he had no idea where the police commanders went. As more gunshots were heard during the night, Mr Wuthisak tried to contact police officers to come and help the students, but to no avail. At about 11pm, he tried again after he heard gunshots and ping-pong bomb explosions from the flyover in front of the university. \’\’At this point, I called [Deputy Prime Minister] Pol Gen Pracha Promnok for help,\’\‘ Mr Wuthisak said. \’\’The police officers at Rajamangala said they would come immediately. \’\’I waited for them at the main gate for around 15 minutes. However, he phoned me later telling me that they could not come because of the confrontations in Soi 24. So, I said never mind, and from that point on, I knew that we had to take care of ourselves.\’\‘ Pol Gen Pracha, head of the Centre for the Administration of Peace and Order (Capo) at the time, sent two police patrol cars to be stationed on the flyover, but no police officers were seen by Spectrum inside the campus.
Back street brawl
The main back gate to the university was closed, but a small side gate was open, giving students access to Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24, which runs along the back of the campus and the stadium, and is home to many small shops. It was this small gate that a group of students armed with clubs and steel bars used to enter the soi and confront a group of red shirts, according to photographers and journalists at the scene. However, after four or five gunshots were heard, the students retreated onto the campus. At about 8pm, a Cambodian woman in tears walked onto campus from the building site for the university\’s new stadium. She asked the media for help, saying her husband had been shot in the back and was lying in the rear of the building. His fellow construction workers told Spectrum they were taking a rest when several bullets hit their makeshift camp, forcing them to flee back inside the building. Spectrum revisited the site and saw bullet fragments and four or five spots on the cement bases of the workers\‘ camp that appeared to have been caused by gunfire. The Cambodian, who survived, was the first gunshot victim in Soi 24. A shop owner in the soi who witnessed the fights, said students had tried to block red shirts getting to the stadium via the back street as Ramkhamhaeng Road was closed. The university lights were turned off, causing the soi to be dimly lit. She also claimed she saw men in police uniforms firing shots. \’\’I saw police in uniform shoot at two students,\’\‘ she said. \’\’Their friends took them away and I heard afterwards that they were severely injured.\’\‘ She said that wafter the first two students were shot, the two groups kept fighting. She said the students were armed with clubs, bricks and stones while many of their opponents had guns.
\’\’More than 90% of gunshots were from the red shirts,\’\‘ she said. \’\’After the red shirt group couldn\’t get inside the stadium, more people from inside came out to help. Then the students were confronted on both sides, so they had to retreat back inside the university and lock the gate.\’\‘ She said after the students retreated a group of red shirts and men in black fired into the university grounds.
She also claimed to have witnessed the murder of a student. \’\’The student was standing alone during the attack, he was hit by a group of red shirts then shot dead.\’\‘ One local man, Paisit, said he was sitting in a restaurant when he witnessed red shirts firing on the students. \’\’I could see four people holding guns just near the restaurant,\’\‘ he said. \’\’One of those started shooting at two students.
\’\’There were some police officers standing in the area but they did nothing.\’\‘ He said that initially there was an announcement from the Ramkhamhaeng students urging them not to be rash as they had no weapons for protection.
\’\’The Ramkhamhaeng students were besieged by red shirts,\’\‘ he said. \’\’The weapons the students had were wooden clubs. After that there were four people injured. Some of them had severe injuries _ I\’m not sure whether they survived or not.\’\‘ The next day, he and his friends collected 9mm shells in the area. He is convinced the students were unarmed. Another witness in Soi 24 told Spectrum a \’\’long convoy\’\‘ of police cars arrived at around midnight after a number of people were already dead.
A security guard at a clothing shop on the soi said the students had antagonised the red shirts all night. He said he heard explosions that he believed were fire crackers being thrown at the red shirts. He and seven other security guards were told to stay inside the building and protect it. However, he says they observed events through a large shop window. \’\’Some of the angry red shirts attacked the students in the morning,\’\‘ he said. \’\’I think it is because the students goaded them for the whole night. Still, the students were lucky. If all the red shirts from the stadium came out it would have been much worse.\’\‘ He said he was also worried by talk that soldiers or police had shot one of the students. He said the security guards inside the clothing shop were apprehensive, but the students did not retaliate. \’\’It made me afraid they would mistake my uniform for that of a policeman or soldier as it looks similar to the border patrol uniform,\’\‘ he said. \’\’We all had to change into casual clothes for safety reasons.\’\‘ Hua Mak station\’s Pol Col Narongrit said police did not fire any shots and only used riot shields for crowd control. \’\’It was risky to use weapons with people there,\’\‘ he said. \’\’There was the possibility of making a mistake and making the situation worse.\’\‘ He said they tried to keep the warring factions apart and also suggested a number of vocational students, some of whom have a reputation for street violence, had joined the Ramkhamhaeng university students. \’\’We\’re trying to see which institution it was, but there were not only Ramkhamhaeng students in the group,\’\‘ he said.
Pol Col Narongrit said four officers stationed in front of the university were injured during the fights, while a police car at the back of the university was damaged \’\’when it tried to get to the centre of the attack\’\‘.
Dangerous Dawn
Mr Wuthisak slept in his office and awoke at about 6am on Sunday. He said he did not see any police cars on the flyover and walked towards the fence in front of the university. However, the morning silence was broken by the sound of gunshots and he retreated to the back of the building housing his office where he heard more shots and saw his students crying for help. Several had been shot.
He used the university\’s public address system to order students scattered around the campus to move inside the buildings. Mr Wuthisak again contacted police. He waited until 10am for them to arrive, but after they failed to show up for a second time he contacted the military for help. \’\’Considering what happened in the morning, my staff and I wished to move the students out of the compound as quickly as possible because if we were still in the compound, more attacks were likely,\’\‘ Mr Wuthisak said. About 150 military officers were sent in to help the students in the afternoon and the evacuation of students was completed a few hours later. The rector then left the compound with his staff and declared the temporary closure of the university. \’\’You ask whether or not the students have something to do with the ongoing protests outside,\’\‘ he said when asked what role the students played in baiting the red shirts into violent reprisal. \’\’I would say some of the students have been joining the protests, but here it is very clear that what they demanded has nothing to do with the ongoing political situation,\’\‘ he said. \’\’They just wanted to protect the university\’s dignity.\’\‘
Phoo said inside the campus there were no more attacks after midnight, but at around 6am there were shots heard at the front gate of the university. \’\’During the night, most of the gunshots were from the back of the university, but in the morning it sounded like it was happening right next to us,\’\‘ she said. She said the students\‘ sense of security quickly disappeared during the morning as they waited for police to arrive. She said they were given assurances by local people that if the situation worsened they could seek shelter in their homes. \’\’The villagers who live in the area are mostly Muslim, and they were very nice to us,\’\‘ she said. \’\’They told us that if anything happens while we are escaping, we can run into anyone\’s house and they would be happy to offer us shelter. I feel lucky I made it out alive.\’\‘ A vendor from Soi 24 said the red shirts were bent on revenge in the morning, even attacking local residents. \’\’There were plenty of them on the street when a local rode his motorcycle past,\’\‘ he said. \’\’I heard them shout loudly \’Rush to the front of Ramkhamhaeng.\‘
\’\’They stopped him and destroyed the motorbike. I don\’t know why they did that. Everyone around there [in the early morning] ran away as the red shirts seemed to attack everyone, even locals beside the road.\’\‘
The Aftermath
Five people are confirmed to have died in the conflict, three of those identified as red shirts.
Organisers of the red shit rally at Rajamangala stadium claim two of their supporters were shot in or around the stadium, one by a sniper hiding on the university campus. Viroj Khemnak, 43, and Visanu Phaophu, 26, were shot dead on Sunday morning, and the Senate committee on human rights is investigating the killings. Off-duty soldier Pte Thanasit Viengkham, 22, was pronounced dead on Monday after he fell into a coma after a gunshot to the head sustained at around 2am on Sunday, on Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24. Thanasit\’s uncle said his nephew was a regular attendee of the 2010 red shirt rallies. \’\’On Saturday night, when there was a call for volunteers to patrol the stadium and guard tens of thousands of us inside, many young folks such as vocational students and ordinary people like Mr Thanasit offered to do so,\’\‘ said Thasit Viengkham. The charred bones found in the burned bus outside the campus could be the remains of Suradet Khampaengjai, a 17-year-old student of Bangkapi Technology College, who disappeared on Sunday. Relatives believe a ring, key and belt buckle found on the bus are his. A friend of Suradet\’s said that Suradet and another person rode a motorcycle from Ekamai Soi 30 to the stadium on Sunday afternoon where they were attacked with a ping-pong bomb. The two rushed to hide on the bus, which was damaged and parked nearby.
The friend said he heard someone shout \’\’fire\’\‘, so he fled the bus and lost contact with Suradet.
The only student confirmed dead is Thaweesak Phokaew, 21, who was shot dead by an unidentified gunman in Soi 24 at about 8pm on Saturday. A total of 64 people were injured during the confrontations in and around Ramkhamhaeng Road. That the red shirt side suffered three deaths given the multiple accounts of them and men in police uniforms being armed seems unusual.
There are accusations from the students and red shirts that provocateurs were on the streets that night changing from casual clothes into police uniforms and black attire. From the accounts of witnesses and police theories, the gunmen who fired the fatal shots were familiar with firearms. Initial forensic results show most of the victims were killed at fairly close range with the shooter standing either directly in front of or behind the victims. Pol Gen Jaramporn says an initial forensic examination of Thaweesak\’s body indicates he was shot by someone directly in front of him as the bullets ran through his chest horizontally. His body was found slumped in a telephone booth outside the university gate, and police officers collected 11mm bullets from the scene. \’\’The shooting was straight,\’\‘ said Pol Gen Jaramporn. \’\’It suggests that the shooter was precise.\’\‘ Police say they deployed at least three battalions during that night, mainly stationed at the stadium for crowd control.
They say they checked protestors at the stadium for weapons and at least two men were arrested.
One was found carrying more than 100 rounds for a 9mm gun. Police received a report at 2am on Sunday that a man found at the back gate of the stadium in Soi 24 was shot through his helmet.
He was sent to a hospital but later died. Again, the bullet entry was horizontal. Police have asked for the bullet from the hospital for further forensic examination to determine the type of gun used. They have already collected .22 calibre casings from near where the man\’s body was found.
The victim is likely to be the off-duty soldier who died in hospital on Monday. Police also received a report at around 4am that a body had been discovered in the stadium. Viroj Khemnak was shot in the chest when he was walking from the stadium to the toilet. Pol Gen Jaramporn said the bullet entry point suggested Viroj was shot from the opposite side of the stadium, which Ramkhamhaeng University is located behind. Visanu Phaophu was shot at around 6.30am on Sunday as he was heading home. Police said witnesses said he had been chased by a group of people after exiting Gate 1 at the stadium. Based on the entry angle of the bullet, they believe he was standing on the pavement and the shooter was on the road. He was shot in the chest by a 9mm gun from close range, police said. Pol Gen Jaramporn said the police conducted a search in several locations around Ramkhamhaeng University where the clashes were reported and around the stadium. They found at least 34 bullet casing of seven different types. \’\’There were certainly more than seven guns used in this incident,\’\‘ said Pol Gen Jaramporn. He declined to comment on whether there were snipers in the university as claimed by the university\’s executives.
Police say they have six criminal cases; four involve the killings, the other two involve property damage to a bus and a van. \’\’We will not rush to conclude the cases but let the evidence, as well as the witnesses, show what happened. We\’re trying our best to investigate, both by conducting forensic examinations and questioning witnesses before issuing any arrest warrants.\’\‘ But one red shirt supporter who was at Rajamangala stadium said they were told the students were armed and attacking the red shirts trying to get to the venue. When she left the stadium at about 8pm to buy food she heard an explosion and gunshots. She said a security guard told all red shirts to retreat into the stadium. \’\’I wasn\’t panicking,\’\‘ she said. \’\’I joined the rally in 2010 and I experienced worse. So I didn\’t try to rush back to the stadium _ I walked around the area to observe the situation. \’\’That\’s when I heard over the security guard\’s walkie-talkie a man saying that a fellow red shirt had been shot dead at the back of Ramkhamhaeng University, around Soi 24.\’\‘ She said she walked back into the stadium to tell her grandmother the news but someone had already made the announcement from the stage. \’\’No one knows who shot the red shirt supporter,\’\‘ she said. \’\’But the man on stage said that a man in a black T-shirt with a Thai flag ribbon tied around their head shot the red shirt.
\’\’I heard it from other protesters that these men in black T-shirts have guns. Our unarmed guards fought back with just rocks and clubs. The guards managed to get four of the men in black shirts for questioning but they would not say who hired them,\’\‘ she said. She said the stadium was surrounded by students, or people claiming to be students, and the red shirts stayed inside until morning.
\’\’Ten red shirts tried to leave the stadium because they were scared, but they were stopped by a group of students and beaten up,\’\‘ she said. \’\’They came back with bruises and one had a broken collar bone from the attack.\’\‘
Die Historie in Bildern und Deutsch..
http://www.yanawa.blogspot.co.at/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00%2B07:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00%2B07:00&max-results=50
Sie (YL) führte aus, dass das Reisprogramm korrekt und transparent ablief. Solche Programme gebe es schon seit 33 Jahren, sagte sie, es helfe Leuten mit niedrigen Einkommen.
Gut, dass die gute Frau aus dem Amt entfernt wurde. Das Reisprogramm lief korrekt und transparent ab, so ihre Meinung. Wenn seit 33 Jahren dieses Reisprogramm so korrekt und transparent durchgeführt wurde, stellt sich doch die Frage, wie hoch dann die Staatsverschuldung nach 33 Reisjahren sein müsst? Frau YLs Produkt soll jedenfalls 3,4 Milliarden EURO an Schulden eingebracht haben. Entweder haben ihre Vorgänger korrekt und transparent gearbeitet oder sie?
„..Sie war noch vor dem Putsch im Mai letzten Jahres durch ein Gericht des Amtes enthoben worden, weil sie einen Beamten versetzt hatte..“
Genau, dass war halt der Chef des Rechnungshofes, der es wagte, Thaksins Schwester auf die eben nicht Transparenz des Reisprogrammes hinzuweisen. Ok, es ist natürlich ein Unding, Thaksins Schwester auf etwas hinzuweisen, so etwas tut man halt nicht. Nur, wenn er es nicht getan hätte, hätte er heute neben YL auf der Anklagebank gesessen. Denn, der Rechnungshof hat doch seine Berechtigung dadurch erhalten, der Regierung von Ungereimtheiten in Kenntnis zu setzen. Reaktion der einzigen demokratischen Regierungschefin war eine Strafversetzung, die ein ordentliches Gesetz danach gegen Faru YL wieder aufhob und ihr die Amtsenthebung verpasste.
Genauso ist es.
Unser Militärdiktator sollte sich überlegen was er eigentlich mit „Versöhnung“ meint!
Es gibt in Thailand keine ideologischen Gegensätze weil es keine Ideologien gibt!
Und es gibt schon garkeine echte Rote hier!
Es gibt aber einen gewählten Herrscher der die Gesetze des Landes
entweder für sich hat umschreiben lassen oder sich an die restlichen
Gesetze nicht gehalten hat und seine roten und braunen Hilfstruppen
ausserhalb der geltenden Gesetze agieren lies ohne dass diese
dafür zur Verantwortung gezogen wurden!
Wenn Prayuth unter „Versöhnung“ die stillschweigende Amnestie
dieser Kriminellen versteht so widerspricht dies seiner eigenen
Intention als er die Macht von der weggelaufenen Yingluck
Regierung übernommen hat!
berndgrimm(Quote) (Reply)
Es ist nicht nur typisch Thai (weglaufen vor jeder Verantwortung)
sondern auch exemplarischfür das Machtverständnis des Clans:
Sowohl VaterBruder als auch TochterSchwester lehnen jegliche
Verantwortung ihrer Taten ab, aber nicht das Kassieren
ihrer Betrugsgewinne!Denn die sind ja der gerechte Lohn
für ihre geleistete „Arbeit“!
Und ihre im Amt belassenen Lakaien im OAG die eigentlich
den Ankläger für den Staat darstellen sollen,
wirken schon im Vorfeld als Verteidiger des grossen Führers
und seines Nummerngirls!
Ich weiss nicht was Prayuth dazuveranlasst sich diese Groteske
vorspielen zu lassen.
Es wäre jedenfalls ein grosser Fehler wenn Yingluck,
die „Nichtverantwortliche“, unbestraft davonkommen würde.
Auch wenn sie selber davon überzeugt ist dass sie einen phantastischen
Job getan hat.
Kein PM vor ihr hat so viele Shopping Malls in aller Welt besucht wie sie!
Da der NLA im Wesentlichen durch die Militärjunta handverlesenen wurde, stecken die regierenden Generäle in einem Dilemma ..
.. und auch der aktuelle PM konnte somit auf der Anklagebank enden !!!
http://bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/455437/a-saga-and-sideshow-with-much-at-stake
ich denke nicht, das ein Putsch-General angeklagt wird, auch wenn es wieder eine Thaksin-Marionetten-Regierung kommen sollte. Im Gegenteil, die werden dann noch süsser
mit dem Militär verhandeln, um an der Macht bleiben zu können. Hat ja Yingluck auch getan. Ausserdem gehe ich davon aus, das nie wieder eine Thaksin-Marionetten-Regierung kommen wird, ansonsten gibt es 1-2 Jahre später wohl wieder einer Putsch. Mir hat mal ein Kamnan aus Trang erklärt, das der Süden – niemals Thaksin wieder an die Macht lassen wird, auch nicht Marionetten. Also auch wenn das Militär sich mit Thaksin einig werden sollte, der Süden tut es nicht und ich bezweifle sehr stark, dass je Militärs auf Gelbhemden-Demonstranten schiessen würden – genausowenig, wie Polizisten auf Rothemden.
Yingluck verteidigte das Programm. «Wir wollten nur den Bauern helfen», sagte sie. Nach Angaben der Korruptionsbehörde verlor der Staat durch die Subventionen 3,4 Milliarden Euro.
Moin an die Runde,
was sie wollte, wissen wir, was daraus wurde, wissen wir auch.
Das Wörtchen Nachhaltigkeit scheint im Wortschatz der Thaksisten nicht vorzukommen.
Wenn die angegebene Summe von 3,4 Milliarden Euro, nicht Baht, stimmt, so ist es eine Summe, wofür eine Frau lange stricken müsste!
Wer so leichtfertig mit den Steuermitteln umgeht hat sich mit Recht vor den Gerichten zu verantworten.
Gewarnt wurde sie ja rechtzeitig von der von ihr geschassten Präsidentin des Rechnungshofes.
Nur, liebe Freunde, interessanter sollte für uns sein, wer da so stark abgesahnt hat, dass die wirklichen Erzeuger des Reisprogrammes in der Mehrzahl auf der Strecke blieben?
Es ist auch zu hoffen, dass die UDD-Goldfasane, die die in Schwarz gekleideten Akteure an die Front der protestierenden Reisbauern sandten mit der Drohung, um Haus und Leben derer zu gefährden, vor den Schranken des Gerichtes erscheinen dürfen.